Meru miraa traders and residents have lauded President William Ruto and Agriculture Cabinet Secretary Mithika Linturi for dismissing and terming muguka ban in Mombasa, Kilifi and Taita Taveta counties as “null and void”.
John Ratanya, a miraa trader in Makandara, Meru town, criticised the initial bans, highlighting their detrimental impact on the local economy.
“It was wrong to ban miraa in Mombasa and other coastal towns. Our livelihoods depend on this trade,” said Ratanya.
Echoing similar sentiments Stephen Kinyua, a trader, emphasized the need for the allocated funds to benefit farmers directly.
“It’s bad to ban Miraa. The money given for value addition should be used for the good of farmers. I laud the leaders who attended the meeting at State House to deliberate on Miraa and Muguka issues,” Kinyua said.
He maintained that miraa should be recognised as a legal cash crop.
“Miraa should be settled as a cash crop once and for all,” he said.
Mungathia Mutugi, a resident and trader in Meru, also criticized the ban, underscoring the significance of Miraa to the community.
“Banning Muguka was not justifiable. The government needs to consider the economic implications for us,” noted Mungathia.
The announcement by the President has sparked relief among traders, who now look forward to a consultative forum to address their concerns.
READ ALSO:
Boost for coffee farmers as Kenya signs MoU with US on collaboration
The forum, as directed by the President, aims to resolve issues surrounding the regulation of Miraa and Muguka, ensuring that the interests of farmers and traders are safeguarded.
The controversy over the muguka ban escalated when Embu Governor Cecily Mbarire, along with Meru leaders, visited Mombasa to challenge the prohibition imposed by Governor Abdulswamad Sheriff Nassir.
Prominent figures like Martha Karua and Senator Aaron Cheruiyot have criticized the ban, highlighting its negative impact on the livelihoods of farmers and traders.
“In the matter of the muguka ban by Mombasa County and Kilifi County what is the position of (the Ministry of Agriculture) because of the Crop (Miraa) Regulations 2021 which recognizes both Miraa and Muguka as legitimate, there is an urgent need to resolve this contradiction,” Karua tweeted on her official X account.
“It’s a noble thing for the coastal counties to seek to regulate the distribution of Muguka in their turf. However, the truth is counties have NO such powers,” Aaron Cheruiyot has insisted.
This comes after two Kenyans filed a lawsuit in Mombasa to challenge the ban on Muguka, Peter Odhiambo and Michael Mutembei, also want the three county governments barred from executing the orders.
The national government’s intervention, with President Ruto and Agriculture CS Linturi declaring the bans “null and void,” has provided hope for further dialogue and policy development to support the Muguka trade.
As the debate continues, the traders and residents of Meru remain hopeful that the national government will uphold policies that support their livelihoods and recognize the importance of Miraa as a cash crop.
By John Majau
Get more stories from our website: Sacco Review.
For comments and clarifications, write to: Saccoreview@
Kindly follow us via our social media pages on Facebook: Sacco Review Newspaper for timely updates
