- A Nairobi court ruled that unlicensed digital lenders cannot sue to recover unpaid loans.
- The decision strengthens the legal position of licensed Saccos over unregulated lenders.
- The ruling also reminds Sacco digital lenders to maintain valid CBK licences.
A Nairobi court has barred unlicensed digital lenders from suing to recover unpaid debts, handing Saccos a clear compliance edge in Kenya’s crowded credit market.
The Nairobi Small Claims Court struck out two debt recovery suits after ruling that the lenders behind them lacked the legal standing to enforce their loan agreements.
Resident Magistrate Gladys Kiama dismissed claims filed separately by Tri-State Capital Limited and Mombo iCapital Limited after both companies failed to show they held a valid licence from the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK).
Tri-State Capital had sought Ksh 500,000 from borrower, saying an initial motor-vehicle-secured loan of Ksh 213,500 had grown after default and additional contractual charges. Mombo iCapital had sought Ksh 162,297 from another borrower over a Ksh 65,000 facility issued in 2025, citing interest and weekly default penalties.
Rather than assess whether the borrowers owed the money, the magistrate first examined whether the lenders had the legal capacity to bring the claims at all.
“The claimant has not demonstrated that it possesses the legal capacity and regulatory authority necessary to engage in the lending activities disclosed in the statement of claim,” Ms Kiama held, citing Section 3 of the Banking Act (Cap 488). “It then follows that conducting lending business without such licensing amounts to an illegality and economic risk.”
A widening compliance gap
The CBK brought non-deposit-taking digital lenders under its supervision in December 2021, requiring them to obtain a licence under the Central Bank of Kenya (Digital Credit Providers) Regulations, 2022. Since then, the regulator has licensed 252 digital credit providers (DCPs) out of more than 800 applications received.
READ ALSO:
EBC warns Kenya’s Ksh995.7B domestic borrowing plan could tighten credit for small businesses
Striking out a suit denies a lender access to court enforcement. It does not automatically cancel the underlying debt, so borrowers should not assume the money is no longer owed.
What it means for Saccos
The ruling sharpens the contrast between regulated and unregulated credit providers at a time when Savings and Credit Co-operative Organisations (SACCOs) are competing with mobile lending apps for the same borrower base.
Saccos already operate under licensing and prudential oversight from the Sacco Societies Regulatory Authority (SASRA), a framework the digital lending sector is still catching up to. That gives Sacco-based lending, including mobile loan products run through Front Office Service Activities (FOSAs), firmer legal footing to recover unpaid balances through the courts than unlicensed competitors now have.
The decision also strengthens the case Saccos have long made to members: borrowing from unlicensed apps carries risks that go beyond high interest rates. Loan officers may want to remind members that while such lenders can no longer sue to collect, the debt itself typically remains outstanding and could still affect a borrower’s credit record.
For Sacco-affiliated entities running their own digital lending platforms, the ruling is also a reminder to keep CBK licensing current, since the same standard the court applied to Tri-State Capital and Mombo iCapital would apply to any Sacco lending arm operating a digital credit product.
By Benedict Aoya
Get more stories from our website: Sacco Review.
For comments and clarifications, write to: Saccoreview@
Kindly follow us via our social media pages on Facebook: Sacco Review Newspaper for timely updates
Stay ahead of the pack! Grab the latest Sacco Review newspaper!
